Skip to content

536 Naked Folks Running the Asylum

The absurdity of the “stimulus package” is self-evident in the way the key Republican moderate conspirator tries to couch the message.

Arlen Specter - Why I Support the Economic Stimulus - washingtonpost.com

I am supporting the economic stimulus package for one simple reason: The country cannot afford not to take action.

This is precisely the sort of “planning” that results in a surgeon cutting off the wrong limb to stem the spread of a cancer. Actually, Congress may be planning to cut off the three healthy limbs by mistakenly identifying the diseased one as the sole healthy one.

“In politics,” John Kennedy used to say, “nobody gets everything, nobody gets nothing and everybody gets something.” My colleagues and I have tried to balance the concerns of both left and right with the need to act quickly for the sake of our country. The moderates’ compromise, which faces a cloture vote today, is the only bill with a reasonable chance of passage in the Senate.

Why don’t they just cut off our heads, too. These “moderates” are being directed by an administration that has, from a communications perspective, bathed in Jimmy Carter eu-du-toilett. Can’t you just feel the “malaise” dripping from Obama’s every word?

The only new spending I can legitimately support is for our national infrastructure, for the sole reason that we paid to rebuild infrastructures of too many nations that now use their American-made modernizations to compete with us. So, give me spending for steel mills and power grids and dams and roads and bridges. Give me tax breaks for corporate research and development conducted to benefit the public.

Don’t anesthetize me to death with bloated programs, or force me to participate in some odd orgy of pork.

This is a freaking charade being led by a new King with no clothes who has gotten his court to get naked, too. If the thought of seeing all those folks naked scares you (ewww!), remember that what they are proposing is far uglier.

Spread the word about this post:
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us

Our Problem: A Fundamental Misapprehension of Human Nature

Throughout the process of our being exposed to the causes of our current, global financial crisis, the thing that has astounded me most is that our leaders… not just President Bush… nearly every single one of them… predicated their actions that led to this upon egalitarian ideals that simply do not correspond to human nature. It is this sort of inculcated Leftist stupidity that leads normally intelligent men to presuppose a whole raft of dangerous notions that simply are not so.

Here’s my short list of dangerous fallacies:

  • All men are not only born equal, but are always equal. If they are not, then something, someone, or some group in the “system” is to blame, and government must fix it.
  • Multiculturalism is a de facto good.
  • Diversity is a de facto good.
  • Basic human nature is benign.
  • Innovation is de facto good.
  • Individual or group “rights” must always trump broader cultural or societal responsibilities.
  • “Equal access” to anything or everything is a de facto good.
  • Egalitarianism must always trump tradition.

And so, considering that most of the above absurd propositions are things that contemporary leaders believe and act upon in ways that surely would astound their predecessors of generations past,  government has striven mightily in its hunt to assassinate all anti-egalitarian snipes.

Which brings us to today, to an expository article in the International Herald Tribune about how the world has been brought to the precipice of perhaps its greatest financial collapse. In reading it, I was looking for something concrete… much in the way I suppose a radiologist might look for a tumor in an MRI… that would reveal the root cause of our problem.

And here it is:

White House philosophy stoked mortgage bonfire - International Herald Tribune

“We absolutely wanted to increase homeownership,” Tony Fratto, his [Bush's] deputy press secretary, recalled him saying. “But we never wanted lenders to make bad decisions.”

Now, I have to admit here that I already knew The Bush Administration truly believed that all people of all races, ethnicities, creeds, intelligence quotients, and life experiences were equally capable of managing the details that go along with home ownership in our society. But I had not yet written about it here and it was time that I pointed it out.

In one short paragraph, this article exposes two assumptions, commonly held by many of our leaders, that our children and probably our children’s children will be paying for throughout their lifetimes.  The legacy it now appears we will leave is simply unconscionable, especially to those of us with traditionalist mindsets attached to stewardship obligations.

It is time for government, for leaders and especially for the snooty, elitist bastards on the left, to stop every social engineering effort they have in mind that is based on false premises regarding human nature. From now on, before those we choose to represent us do anything… and I mean ANYTHING… they must ask themselves the following: Does the world really work this way? Is there any instance in history, any set of acts not committed by Saints or our Savior, that supports what we believe will happen if we do this?

If the answer to these questions is not an overwhelming and utterly unqualified “yes,” then they must not do it. Period.

From what I’ve seen, I don’t believe that we have any leaders capable of the discernment necessary to keep us from the abyss.

Spread the word about this post:
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us

It’s Been A While

Sometimes life gets in the way of things like this blog.  I’ve had plenty to write about, but we had a flood, business has been hectic and I’ve been disturbed by the state of affairs in my nation.  I simply can’t stand either of the insufficient boobs nominated by our two parties.

It is a travesty that what we have this lose-lose situation being played out today thanks to eight years of conservatism being misrepresented by the GOP.  It’s sad for me to realize there is no prominent, decent, honorable, traditional right-conservatism in any public spotlight.  All the public knows as conservatism these days are ideologies espoused by neoconservatives and “compassionate” conservatives, people who aren’t conservative at all.  Conservatism is not ideological.  It is a starting point for thought that requires a mindful reverence for the past as an informative guide, a commitment to stewardship for future generations and that seeks the wisdom to apply both for the betterment of the nation.

There was no legitimate choice for me today.  Sure, the Constitution Party is just about right for me, but I had a point to make.  Here it is:

YouTube Preview Image

Spread the word about this post:
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us

Great Viral Gimmick

This is making its way around the web.  You can get your own, if you watch to the end:

Spread the word about this post:
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us

Conservatives Are Nicer People

This article from Saturday’s London Daily Mail somewhat confirmed something I have been pondering over the past few weeks.

Don’t listen to the liberals - Right-wingers really are nicer people, latest research shows | Mail Online

George Orwell once wrote that politics was closely related to social identity. ‘One sometimes gets the impression,’ he wrote in The Road To Wigan Pier, ‘that the mere words socialism and communism draw towards them with magnetic force every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, nature-cure quack, pacifist and feminist in England’.

It all started when I forwarded to a cousin a bit of minutiae regarding statistical differences between behaviors of peoples of various cultures. The data fascinated me because I have done many analyses of precinct-level voting behavior. Past behavior is a great tool for predicting future behavior. Generally, people within a precinct share a greater level of “sameness” than they do with those in neighboring precincts; people self-differentiate themselves from others when they select a place to call home. This information is pretty much confirmed by various sections of the General Social Survey (GSS) to which the Mail’s article pointed as a source.

My cousin, a dyed in the wool egalitarian leftist, apparently was upset that I had the audacity to even read statistics that explore differences between peoples’ cultural traditions and how they might affect behavior. To him, it appears I have committed some some sort of thought-crime in pondering that people from various cultures might be different in any way at all. To him, all people of every culture and every nation are not only “equal,” they’re “identical;” it is an article that underlies his humanist faith. If people actually are different, and that difference is in any way based upon folkways, traditions, or anything handed down through the generations, then his whole set of assumptions about the way the world works might crumble. (Continued)

Spread the word about this post:
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us